Wedding Enhancers Kit

his simple yet productive set of 12 actions will help you create several common portrait effects, and particularly wedding portraits. The set consists of 11 effects, plus an action with some brief instructions and pointers.

Wedding Enhancers Action Set

Wedding Enhancers Action Set


Included in the set is an action to help enhance skin tones, 4 black and white conversions, a dramatic light contrast action, and 5 variations of soft filter effects.

While these actions were made specifically for use on your wedding pictures, feel free to experiment on other types of images as well. Also, you can acheive a wide variety of results by combining these actions on the same image.




Photoshop CS and higher

File Size:

4 kb


Premium Content

Create: Better, Faster, Funner!


  1. […] 20. Wedding Enhancers Kit […]

  2. What i do not realize is if truth be told how you’re now not actually a lot more smartly-favored than you might be now. You are very intelligent. You know therefore significantly on the subject of this matter, made me in my opinion imagine it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be fascinated except it’s something to do with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs outstanding. All the time maintain it up!

  3. Hello to every body, it’s my first pay a visit of this webpage; this weblog consists of awesome and in fact good material designed for visitors.

  4. […] 14-W edding Enhancers Kit […]

  5. […] 20. Wedding Enhancers Kit […]

  6. Kymberly says:

    that, the key then is what kind of gratification rcvieeed is considered ‘bribery’. Obviously those that were solicited from the recipient (public officer) can be. But what if offered from the vendor? That’s kind of tricky. Can you say a vendor offered a gold plated plaque as goodwill is considered bribery? If in doubt, it’s always better that the officer declare it.But as of now, I’ve yet to read about any evidence presented that Ng coerced Sue for sexual gratification with promises of favouring her company or Sue provided sexual gratification to bias Ng. There no link yet to bribery although we can guess there must be but the court has to hear all evidence, especially evidence on bribery.

    • Mul says:

      Since both the fellator and feelltae were never caught in the act.Either Cecilia is the whistle blower or there is an unnamed 3rd party who is the whistle blower.I get the impression that CPIB just sits on their backside waiting for business (complaints) to walk through the front door.I don’t think CPIB spends their time lurking around in carpark spying on couples in parked cars.

  7. […] 20. Wedding Enhancers Kit […]

    • Sergey says:

      This ho-ha over a sexual tryst betewen 2 consenting adults is just a smoke screen. It happens all the time. Why is this different? Something else is going on. Why would NBG be in hot water if he is still favored by the ruling party? Perhaps someone above no longer likes him and has no further use for him. If he is coveted as a useful tool, all this dirt can be easily washed away or swept under the carpet by the powers above. He no longer enjoys the protection of the powers that put him there.The saucy wayang and intimate details of the plot also serves as entertainment for the masses. It keeps the people from more important issues such as rising costs, FT, housing, jobs, transport, etc. They are issues our government want to maintain as low profile as possible.In the end, these 2 individuals’ lives will be destroyed, along with them their families’ future. One has to ask: “Who is going to gain from all this?”

  8. […] 20. Wedding Enhancers Kit […]

    • Mchito says:

      Given the long drawn conflicting naurte of evidence given thus far there is no absolute certainty if sex indulged is consensual or non-consensual, although I am inclined towards the former. Since both are adults, having sex is no crime. They have not filed complaint against each other and they find themselves in hot soup only because CPIB hauled them up.There is no concrete evidence of Ng Boon Gay having favoured Cecilia Sue in the award of any contract or for that matter if there was any contract to be awarded under his jurisdiction during the material time of their relationship. Can any charge based on “intent to obtain favours in future despite having obtained none at present” stick? I hardly think so.I am a layman not trained in law. But based on the facts of the case revealed so far, I would dismiss the case and clear NBG.

  9. Hello! I would also like if possible a set of actions for photographers to retouch some photos may look flawless! Thanks forward answer!

1 2 3 4 5 6

Join the Discussion